Add support to update secondary and primary storage URLs

[Pearl1594]

Description

This PR fixes: #11742

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[Pearl1594]

@DaanHoogland do you think we need to expose updating this via UI or leave this as a API only field? I feel it could be a bit of a dangerous operation should it be used incorrectly.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 18.08%. Comparing base (522283b) to head (3bae392).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ain/java/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java	0.00%	21 Missing ⚠️
...api/command/admin/storage/UpdateImageStoreCmd.java	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...src/main/java/com/cloud/server/StatsCollector.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #13193      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     18.08%   18.08%   -0.01%     
- Complexity    16718    16719       +1     
============================================
  Files          6037     6037              
  Lines        542580   542665      +85     
  Branches      66427    66444      +17     
============================================
+ Hits          98136    98141       +5     
- Misses       433417   433497      +80     
  Partials      11027    11027              

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.51% <ø> (ø)
unittests	19.24% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 40%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud